- In Action
- Knowledge & Resources
- About Us
- News & Events
- Members / Associates
Compensation for Ship-source Marine Oil Spills
A spill of oil from a ship can cause a financial loss for a variety of organisations and individuals. Despite the best efforts of those concerned, the resultant clean-up can be protracted and costly.
Oil may cause damage to property and lead to economic loss, particularly affecting fishing and tourism. Work may be required to restore parts of the marine environment affected by the oil. Those placed at a financial disadvantage as a result of a spill of oil may be eligible for compensation.
Legal Basis for Compensation
The payment of compensation for damage caused as a result of ship-source oil spills is dependent to a large extent upon the legal regime applicable within the country in which the incident or damage occurs.
Four International Conventions provide the basis for compensation in the majority of countries:
- The Civil Liability Convention (CLC) provides compensation for spills of persistent oil carried in tankers up to the shipowner's liability limit and is paid by the vessel's insurer.
- The Fund Convention provides a second tier of compensation for spills of persistent oil from tankers, paid by receivers of oil in countries that have signed the convention. A Supplementary Fund is available providing a third tier of compensation.
- The Bunkers Convention applies to spills of bunker oil from a variety of ships, again up to the shipowner's liability limit and is paid by the vessel's insurer.
- The Hazardous and Noxious Substances (HNS) Convention applies to spills of other oils such as non-persistent hydrocarbon oils, vegetable oils and chemicals, carried in bulk and in packaged form. The HNS Convention is not yet in force.
Although different in their application, these conventions have many principles in common. For example, they apply primarily to spills in the waters of countries that have signed that convention. A claim for reimbursement of losses can be made under the conventions without the need to prove that the owner of the ship causing the pollution was at fault. However, each has a time limit during which claims can be submitted.
In countries that have not signed an applicable convention, or when the convention is not yet in force, the availability of compensation will depend upon national legislation. For example, the Oil Pollution Act (OPA) in the United States, or Merchant Shipping Acts in the UK, India, Singapore etc.
Sources of Compensation
The majority of vessels operating in international trade are insured for third party liabilities by a Protection and Indemnity (P&I) Club. For oil pollution incidents, the P&I Clubs and other insurers may pay for losses up to the amount set by the applicable convention or national legislation. In most instances therefore, claims for compensation should be made to the shipowner or the insurer of the vessel.
For spills under the Fund Convention, compensation above the tanker-owners' liability limit may be available from the International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds (IOPC Funds) secretariat based in London. When the HNS Convention comes into force, the second tier of compensation, for claims above the shipowner's liability, may be administered by a comparable secretariat under similar circumstances.
An agreement exists between the P&I Clubs and IOPC Funds to share information during an incident, allowing claims to be coordinated between the two organisations. The Small Tanker Oil Pollution Indemnification Agreement (STOPIA) and the Tanker Oil Pollution Indemnification Agreement (TOPIA) have been established to balance compensation between shipowners and oil receivers.
Under certain circumstances, compensation may be available from a national government fund, for example if the shipowner has paid upto the applicable liability limit or the international conventions do not apply.
Irrespective of the expected source of compensation, the procedure for dealing with claims will usually follow a series of steps. It is the responsibility of the claimant to provide adequate evidence of their loss. The assessment may take the form of iterative exchanges between the claimant and those responsible for settling the claim, until the process has been completed. Further information and evidence may be requested during the process. In most cases, agreement on the amount of compensation to be paid is reached on an amicable basis.
The type of information required to support a claim depends upon the type of loss, in particular whether the loss is incurred as a result of the cost of responding to the incident or as a result of the effects of the oil on, for example, tourism or fisheries businesses. However, the quality of this documentation and other information required depends to a large extent upon the measures taken to record and preserve this information at the time the loss is incurred. Experts, including ITOPF, appointed by the body paying compensation can advise on this matter and on measures to mitigate losses.
It is important to note that under the International Conventions, the losses claimed should be technically reasonable. As such, a claim should be based on the actual costs or losses incurred and should not result in an excessive level of profit to the claimant.
The aim of the conventions is to place the injured party in a position as close as possible to that prior to the incident. To enable this, four primary groups of claims can be submitted:
- Clean-up and Preventive Measures - for the costs of work to recover spilled oil from the sea and sunken wrecks, to protect sensitive areas from contamination, and to clean affected shorelines and wildlife;
- Property Damage - for the costs of cleaning, repair or replacement of oiled property;
- Economic Loss - for losses incurred as a result of spilled oil, either as a consequence of contaminated property or other reasons; and
- Environmental Damage - work undertaken to monitor and accelerate the natural recovery of damaged areas.
Also, under the HNS Convention, claims for death and personal injury are allowed.
Costs of spills
The cost of oil spills varies considerably from one incident to another, depending on a number of interrelated factors. The type of oil, the location of the spill and the characteristics of the affected area are generally the most important technical factors. However, the quality of the contingency plan and of the management and control of the actual response operations are also crucial.
Explore Documents on Compensation
Facilitating the speedy payment of oil spill compensation claims Under the CLC and Fund Convention (2002)
The prompt settlement of claims for compensation following oil spills from tankers is in everyone's interests, especially those who have incurred clean-up costs, had their property contaminated or suffered economic losses.
The NAKHODKA and ERIKA oil spills in Japan and France, respectively, have once again focused the attention of politicians, regulators, the media and claimants on the potentially high cost of such events and the adequacy of the current international compensation arrangements.
Admissibility of claims for compensation for environmental damage under the 1992 Civil Liability and Fund Conventions (2001)
The definition of Pollution Damage in the 1992 Civil Liability and Fund Conventions provides that "compensation for impairment of the environment other than loss of profit from such impairment shall be limited to costs of reasonable measures of reinstatement actually undertaken or to be undertaken".
The 1971 and 1992 International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds ("IOPC Funds") provide compensation to the victims of oil spills from tankers in countries which have ratified the 1971 and 1992 Fund Conventions.
This paper briefly summarises the impact of oil spills on different components of the marine environment, as well as the potential for natural recovery and man-made restoration/re-instatement measures, as envisaged under the international compensation Conventions.